Nigel Farage has been widely criticised for comments suggesting Prime Minister Rishi Sunak lacks an understanding of “our culture,” with many accusing him of using racially charged dog whistle politics to exploit cultural divisions for political gain. Here’s the full story.
Farage’s Signature Move
Nigel Farage, the newly appointed leader of Reform UK, who took power in the party in a murky and secretive way, has once again done what he does best: igniting controversy by making outlandish statements.
Attack on Sunak
Following Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s surprise decision to leave D-Day commemorations early to take part in an interview with ITV, Farage launched a full verbal assault against him in comments which have been decried as racist from across the political spectrum.
“Our Culture”
Of Sunak, Farage stated, “He doesn’t really care about our history. He doesn’t really care, frankly, about our culture. This man is not patriotic.”
Immediate Backlash
The backlash to Farage’s comments was immediate, with Mel Stride, the Conservative Work and Pensions Secretary, describing Farage’s remarks as “deeply regrettable” and “ill-advised.”
Pride in Diversity
Stride added, “I feel very uncomfortable with that… I’m very proud of the fact that we have a British Asian who is right at the top of our government.”
Is Sunak an Outsider?
Farage was asked outright by the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg if, by saying “our culture,” Farage was trying to cast Sunak as an outsider due to his Asian heritage.
Commonwealth Contribution
Farage attempted to defend the comments to Kuenssberg, stating, “I know what your question is leading at – 40% of our contribution in World War One and World War Two came from the Commonwealth.”
Disconnected by Privilege
He added that Sunak “is utterly disconnected by class, by privilege from how the ordinary folk in this country feel. He revealed that, I think spectacularly, when he left Normandy early.”
Failed to Impress
However, Farage, who is undoubtedly a gifted orator, could not impress everyone with the defence of his statements.
“Classic Farage Trick”
Labour’s Shabana Mahmood criticised Farage’s response, saying, “I think this is a classic Nigel Farage trick, lean just enough to signal a bit of a dog whistle and then lean straight back and sound perfectly reasonable and say something good about the contribution that Commonwealth soldiers, ethnic minorities made towards the war effort.”
Veneer of Respectability
She added, “We can all see exactly what Nigel Farage is doing, he’s got form, it is completely unacceptable. This is a man that has a track record of seeking to divide communities who just wants to do it with a veneer of respectability whilst he’s at it.”
Calculated Provocation
Many opposition figures referenced that the timing and nature of Farage’s remarks, combined with his history of inflammatory statements, led them to believe his attack was a calculated effort to stir racial and cultural divisions.
Positioning Reform UK
Farage’s comments come as he actively seeks to position Reform UK as a formidable political force ahead of the upcoming general election.
Unsettling the Conservatives
His reentry into mainstream politics has unsettled the Conservatives, who fear losing support to Farage’s populist rhetoric.
Tory Concerns
Senior Tories are concerned that Farage’s appeal could undermine their electoral base, especially in areas where dissatisfaction with traditional party politics is high. Some Tories, such as Jacob Rees-Mogg, have even called for a pact with Reform UK.
Subtle Strategy
Following his sudden and explosive reentry to British politics, Farage’s critics argue that his statements are part of a broader strategy of using subtle racial and cultural references to appeal to nationalist sentiments without overt racism.
Skirting Acceptability
Mahmood is not the only political commentator who has pointed out that Farage’s rhetoric often skirts the line of acceptability, nodding to prejudiced views while maintaining plausible deniability.
Sunak’s Response
In response to the comments, Sunak avoided mention of Farage at all, simply stating, “I’m not really interested in Reform. Quite frankly, I’m interested in delivering for the British people with the agenda that I’m setting out.”
Focus on Delivery
He added, “I’m very clear about what I stand for, and the action that we’re prepared to take to deliver a more secure future for everybody.”
Debate on Identity
However, as he surely intended, Farage’s attack on Sunak has sparked debate about cultural identity and patriotism and highlighted underlying tensions within British society, particularly around issues of race and belonging.
Thriving on Division
In these areas of tension, these cracks in the veneer of British civility and politeness, Farage tends to thrive, and his message tends to be heard the loudest.
Exploiting Divisions
Nigel Farage’s criticism of Rishi Sunak, while ostensibly about a lapse in cultural understanding, has been widely interpreted as an attempt to exploit racial and cultural divisions for political gain.
Master of Controversy
Farage’s ability to provoke controversy is perhaps his greatest ability as a political figure as he attempts to get elected in the upcoming election, a task he has failed the previous seven times he has tried.
Election Uncertainty
As the election draws ever closer, it remains to be seen whether Farage’s dog whistles will become more overt or whether they will remain just enough under the radar to allow him to finally achieve that which he has most coveted: a seat in Parliament.
The post Farage Accused of Racism After Criticizing Sunak’s Cultural Understanding first appeared on Now Buzz.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Foto-berlin.net.